Turn Product Information into an FAQ | Follow-Along Exercise

Lo que vas a crear

A text deliverable that fits the task, a fact-check sheet and a reusable prompt.

Lo que necesitas

• A chat, image or video tool suited to the task (PromptKite does not provide model credits)
• Your own input materials and a folder for saving results

Pasos

1. Define the inputs for this exercise

   The demo inputs for this exercise are: Material: Fictional product description: a set of 10 editable poster templates, with PNG previews and SVG files; font files not included; editable in any software that supports SVG. Pricing and refund rules have not been decided yet; Reader: first-time buyers. First confirm whether these conditions fit your situation; replace “paste your material” in the example with real material. Write the goal as a deliverable you can check against.

2. Run it once for your scenario

   Replace the placeholder material in the example with real material you can provide, then give the complete prompt to a chat tool. Redact personal or business information as needed first; if the model asks about missing facts, supply the material rather than asking it to make things up. Focus of this task: extract three groups of questions, before purchase, during use and after sale, and write a short answer for each, drawn only from the material.

3. Check against the criteria and revise

   Check the output against the input: “Does each answer have a source, and does any promise go beyond the material? Verify names, numbers and qualifiers in the input.” Tag each conclusion with its supporting material; move anything unsupported to a “to be confirmed” section. Pick one wording or structural problem to fix and compare the old and new versions, rather than just asking for it to be “more professional.”

4. Save and review

   Save the final result, the prompt, the source of your input material and one reason for a change. Name files with the date plus the task name; save reusable versions to your PromptKite Prompt Pocket. Next time, change one condition and try again, noting whether the result still holds.

Errores frecuentes

• The input is still placeholder text, so the output looks empty — Replace placeholders such as “paste your material” in the example with real material; state clearly that missing facts are unknown instead of asking the model to fill them in.
• The result doesn't meet the standard for this scenario — Check the output against the input: “Does each answer have a source, and does any promise go beyond the material? Verify names, numbers and qualifiers in the input.” Tag each conclusion with its supporting material; move anything unsupported to a “to be confirmed” section. Pick one wording or structural problem to fix and compare the old and new versions, rather than just asking for it to be “more professional.”

Plantilla de práctica

Complete the task using the following inputs: the material is “{subject}”; the readers are first-time buyers. Extract three groups of questions, before purchase, during use and after sale, and write a short answer for each, drawn only from the material. Mark missing refund periods, compatibility or pricing as “to be confirmed,” and don't invent service promises. Provide a list of questions to hand over to a human and a field for the last-updated date. Output in this order: understanding and assumptions, ready-to-use text, information I need to confirm, and next steps. Use clear, short sentences and avoid empty slogans; if key inputs are missing, ask at most three specific questions instead of filling in facts with guesses. Finally, check item by item whether it meets my purpose, and state clearly which results still need human review.